WIJAYANTI, RANI DEWI (2018) An analysis of Teacher’s Oral Feedback In EFL Classroom Interaction at SMA Negeri 8 Kediri. Undergraduate (S1) thesis, IAIN Kediri.
Text
COVER.pdf Download (282kB) |
|
Text
chapter 1.pdf Download (215kB) |
|
Text
CHAPTER II.pdf Download (96kB) |
|
Text
CHAPTER III.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (122kB) |
|
Text
CHAPTER IV.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (166kB) |
|
Text
BAB V.pdf Download (64kB) |
|
Text
BIBLIOGRAPHY.pdf Download (74kB) |
Abstract
This study focused on the teacher’s oral corrective feedback in EFL classroom interaction at SMA Negeri 8 Kediri. Based on Lyster and Ranta Theory there are six types of oral corrective feedback. Those are Explicit correction, recast, clarification request, meta-linguistic cue, elicitation and repetition. The research was qualitative analysis. There were 3 participants or English teacher from SMA Negeri 8. The instruments of this research were the researcher and observation sheet. The result of this research showed that teachers used 5 types oral corrective feedback, namely Explicit correction, recast, clarification, elicitation and repetition. There was found 34 data from the observation such as 9 data for explicit correction, 9 data for repetition, 6 data for recast, 5 data for elicitation, and 5 data for clarification request. There were 2 teacher used explicit, repetition, and elicitation as they clearly indicated explicit when the teacher immediately correct the error of students’ utterance, than elicitation, corrective form when the teachers use at least three techniques to elicit the correct answers or forms directly from the students by asking questions. Repetition indicated when the teacher directly correct student’s utterance with change intonation to draw student’s attention to it. There was a teacher used recast and clarification request, as they clearly indicated that recast e.g the teacher directly correct the word use with the word used without pointing out the student’s utterance was incorrect. Than clarification request e.g Teacher may ask student for clarification with the main intention of giving student opportunity to self-correct. Student should correct pronunciation the word elepen become eleven. Thus, each type of feedback is very important for the students in their class. So, teachers should be more careful while giving feedback.
Item Type: | Thesis (Skripsi, Tesis, Disertasi) (Undergraduate (S1)) |
---|---|
Subjects: | 20 LANGUAGE, COMMUNICATION AND CULTURE (Ilmu Bahasa, Komunikasi dan Budaya) > 2004 Linguistics (Ilmu Bahasa) > 200401 Applied Linguistics and Educational Linguistics |
Divisions: | Fakultas Tarbiyah > Jurusan Tadris Bahasa Inggris |
Depositing User: | Muh Hamim |
Date Deposited: | 18 Nov 2024 04:00 |
Last Modified: | 18 Nov 2024 04:00 |
URI: | https://etheses.iainkediri.ac.id:80/id/eprint/15782 |
Actions (login required)
View Item |