Hasanah, Muhimatul (2019) Turn taking strategies Used by debaters in the Second Indonesian Presidential Debate 2019. Undergraduate (S1) thesis, IAIN Kediri.
Text
1. COVER.pdf Download (55kB) |
|
Text
Pra.pdf Download (206kB) |
|
Text
skripsi.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (2MB) |
Abstract
The present study aims to examine turn-taking strategies used by Debaters (Joko Widodo and Prabowo Subianto) and also two moderators in the second Indonesian Presidential debate 2019. It is to show the process of turn-taking strategies when Debaters take their turn. Further, debate is argument, dispute, discussion, especially the discussion of questions of public interest in parliament or in any assembly which can be looked how the speaker and listener manage and take to exchange of speaking turn in interaction. There are two problems in this study, First is kind of turn taking strategies which are applied in debaters and second is how the debaters applied those turn taking strategies. The purpose of this study to describe the answer of the research problem. The data is collected by downloading the video in You Tube. It is presented in the form of conversation using Jefferson’s transcription symbol. After finding the data, the data is analyzed by selecting and dividing into some parts based on kinds of turn-taking strategies used by debaters. Then, the data is described and explained comprehensively based on Stanstrom’s theory. Stenstrom shows the theory of turn-taking strategies which is divided into taking the turn strategy, holding the turn strategy, and yielding the turn strategy. Methodologically, the researcher adopts descriptive qualitative method as the research design and uses the researcher herself as the key main instrument. The researcher found out that there are thirty seven data of turn taking strategies based on Stenstroom theory (1994). All of the data are devided into three parts. There are twelve data in taking the turn strategy found (Taking over and interrupting). Holding the turn strategy was found thirteen data (filled pause, silent pause, lexical repetation, and a new start). In yielding the turn strategy were found twelve data (prompting,appealing, and giving up). Not all of sub part is categorize as turn taking strategies, such as starting up strategy including hesitant, filled pause and verbal filler and types of interrupting especially in alert. From this research, the researcher can conclude that not all participants in this debate use turn taking strategies during all sections in this debate because of the rule of debate, the duration of debate, the topic and the personality of each debaters can affect in this debate. But researcher are quite easy to find turn taking used by them because debaters applied a lot of compatibility with the theory.
Item Type: | Thesis (Skripsi, Tesis, Disertasi) (Undergraduate (S1)) |
---|---|
Subjects: | 20 LANGUAGE, COMMUNICATION AND CULTURE (Ilmu Bahasa, Komunikasi dan Budaya) > 2004 Linguistics (Ilmu Bahasa) > 200401 Applied Linguistics and Educational Linguistics |
Divisions: | Fakultas Tarbiyah > Jurusan Tadris Bahasa Inggris |
Depositing User: | Muh Hamim |
Date Deposited: | 14 Mar 2024 03:49 |
Last Modified: | 14 Mar 2024 03:49 |
URI: | https://etheses.iainkediri.ac.id:80/id/eprint/12202 |
Actions (login required)
View Item |