Lestari, Ardelia Putri Eka (2025) The Effectiveness of Peer Correction Compared to Self Correction in Writing Descriptive Paragraph at SMPN 1 Mojo Kediri. Undergraduate (S1) thesis, IAIN Kediri.
![]() |
Text
21202014_prabab.pdf Download (1MB) |
![]() |
Text
21202014_bab1.pdf Download (445kB) |
![]() |
Text
21202014_bab2.pdf Download (827kB) |
![]() |
Text
21202014_bab3.pdf Download (912kB) |
![]() |
Text
21202014_bab4.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (892kB) |
![]() |
Text
21202014_bab5.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (416kB) |
![]() |
Text
21202014_bab5.pdf Download (416kB) |
![]() |
Text
21202014_daftarpustaka.pdf Download (541kB) |
![]() |
Text
21202014_lampiran.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (2MB) |
![]() |
Text
21202014_lembarpernyataanpersetujuanpublikasi.pdf Restricted to Registered users only Download (122kB) |
Abstract
This study investigates the effectiveness of peer correction compared to self-correction in teaching descriptive paragraph writing at SMPN 1 Mojo Kediri. Writing is a crucial skill in English learning, especially for junior high school students who are still developing their ability to express ideas in written form. Among different types of writing, descriptive paragraph is an essential genre that students need to master. The research applied a quantitative approach with a quasi-experimental design. The participants were seventh grade students, divided into two groups: the experimental group (Class 7J) consisting of 28 students using peer correction, and the control group (Class 7H) consisting of 28 students using self-correction. Writing tests were given as pre-test and post-test to measure the students’ achievement. Data were analyzed using SPSS through descriptive statistics, normality test, homogeneity test, and ANCOVA. The findings revealed a significant difference between the two groups. The ANCOVA result showed a significance value of 0.005, indicating that peer correction had a greater impact on students’ writing performance than self-correction. Moreover, the negative coefficient for self-correction confirmed that students in the peer correction group outperformed those in the self-correction group in the post-test. In conclusion, peer correction is more effective than self-correction in improving students’ descriptive writing skills. This method not only helps learners recognize their mistakes but also encourages collaborative learning and critical awareness in the writing process. Keywords: Peer Correction, Self-Correction, Writing Skill, Descriptive Paragraph, Junior High School
Item Type: | Thesis (Skripsi, Tesis, Disertasi) (Undergraduate (S1)) |
---|---|
Subjects: | 13 EDUCATION (Pendidikan) > 1303 Specialist Studies In Education > 130303 Education Assessment and Evaluation (Penilaian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan) 13 EDUCATION (Pendidikan) > 1303 Specialist Studies In Education > 130313 Teacher Education and Professional Development of Educators (Pendidikan Guru dan Pengembangan Profesional Pendidik) |
Divisions: | Fakultas Tarbiyah > Jurusan Tadris Bahasa Inggris |
Depositing User: | Ardelia Putri Eka Lestari |
Date Deposited: | 29 Sep 2025 06:27 |
Last Modified: | 29 Sep 2025 06:27 |
URI: | https://etheses.iainkediri.ac.id:80/id/eprint/19213 |
Actions (login required)
![]() |
View Item |